The results are a pronounced flattening of the distinctive armadillo shape. The armadillo has a tough hide that is able to fend off most predators so when faced with a Peterbilt Semi hugging the centerline in the late afternoon the armadillo curls into a protective ball. The mistake these companies make is analogous to the error an armadillo makes on a Texas highway.
That doesn’t stop people from trying, Microsoft history is littered with companies that thought they had the upper hand or at least a fighting chance and tried standing their ground in the face of Microsoft competition. One only has to look back through the years to see what happens when Microsoft decides to dominate any particular aspect of computing. The increase has been attributed to any number of factors but the reason doesn’t really matter in the long run, if Apple picks up enough steam they might find themselves the object of Microsoft’s wrath.īeing targeted by Microsoft is a very bad thing according to conventional wisdom. Last quarter saw small gains in market share and this quarter, analysts think, will see larger gains.
Internet explorer 7 for apple mac mac#
Currently the Mac platform appears to be going through something of a renaissance. So how does any of this apply to the Mac platform? If Firefox is indeed the reason for Microsoft’s policy shift then the Mac may be in for a very bumpy ride. And that illustrates the fact that, for whatever reason, Microsoft wants to rule the browser arena.
Internet explorer 7 for apple mac for free#
Rather than go into various abstractions of why Microsoft would give something away for free when others were trying to make a buck it is sufficient to note that they did. Microsoft came along and gave a better browser away for free. Netscape controlled the market and charged thirty dollars (if memory serves) for Netscape Gold. If we cast our minds back to the earliest incarnations of Explorer we are hard pressed to think of obvious reasons to release a web browser at all. That argument might have some merit if Microsoft did not obviously want to control the browser market. Here the analytical thinker might point out that since Microsoft isn’t going to charge anything for the browser then there is really no reason to think that Firefox’s popularity is even an issue. The cynical and jaded will argue that Firefox’s recent success prompted Microsoft to do something before a small problem could grow into a big problem. Others might opine that IE 6 has become somewhat hopelessly outdated and lacks many features of more modern browsers. Some might argue that it was an increasing amount of consumer complaints.
In a mildly shocking (think 9 volt battery on the tongue) shift Microsoft has decided to release IE 7 before and (obviously) independently of Longhorn. Think of it as the big payoff for all those years spent beating Netscape into the ground. It made a twisted sort of sense, after all Microsoft had been giving away IE for so long there was no way they could start charging for it directly and, by coupling it with Longhorn only, users would have that much more incentive to jettison XP the day Longhorn shipped.
That is to say that if you wanted the latest version of IE you were going to have to go ahead and pony up the cash for Longhorn.
Most folks took this to mean that there would be no new independent version of IE at all. First a bit of background: Microsoft repeatedly and vehemently maintained that there would be no new version of IE until Longhorn shipped.
0 kommentar(er)
